linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:15:38 +0300
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Steve Brokenshire <sbrokenshire@...tia.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation.

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0100
> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
[]
>> Can I ask you to redo this patch.
>> I want a way to swith off compression, but it should default be
>> enable. So if KBUILD_MODULE_NOCOMPRESS is undefined we will compress
>> the modules when we install them.
> 
> especially since the decompression is an option for the module tools,
> it should be an option for the kernel... 
> since it does add a dependency for the module tools (and one that you
> might not need; for example I disabled it just to remove a build
> requires)

By the way, I for one use busybox for initramfs stuff, since a long
time ago.  And it (still?) does not support decompression of kernel
modules, as of the latest (1.13) version...  I don't think I'm alone
using busybox this way, and it looks like decompression support
should be added to it first, and next to the kernel.. ;)

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/