[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:52 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Thomas Pilarski <thomas.pi@...or.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12562] New: High overhead while switching or
synchronizing threads on different cores
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 09:55 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Ah, that was a good clue, apparently all you need to so it use
> random_r() and provide your own state and all should be well.
Michael, would it make sense to add the random_r() family to the "SEE
ALSO" section of the random() man page?
(Admittedly, my random() manpage is ancient: 2008-03-07, so it might be
this is already the case, in which case, ignore me :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists