linux-kernel - Re: git-send-email

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:13:16 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Junio C Hamano <junio@...ox.com>
CC:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	L-K <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: git-send-email

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> I personally prefer the former, but as you hopefully all found out by now,
> the choice between these two is just the matter of personal taste, and
> there is no clear majority.
> 

Quite on the contrary.  I think there is a clear majority in favor of
--no-chain-reply-to.  Let me add my voice to that chorus, too.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/