| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30 On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > Here is the Ocfs2 changes for this merge window. I sent all these > patches out to the list a couple weeks ago. Original mail is attached. Hmm. And I can _guarantee_ that none of these patches were actually tested as-is, because they were all rebased just minutes before the send. - top commit: Commit: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com> CommitDate: Fri Apr 3 11:39:26 2009 -0700 - email: Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:46:05 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com> So any possible subtle interactions with any other changes would never have been tested very much before the "please pull". Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing. The whole "it compiles, it's perfect, ship it" mentality is _strictly_ only for me. Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists