linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip 4/6 V4.1] x86: kprobes checks safeness of insertion address.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:20:06 -0400
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>
CC:	ananth@...ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 4/6 V4.1] x86: kprobes checks safeness of	insertion
 address.

Jim Keniston wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:02 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Ensure safeness of inserting kprobes by checking whether the specified
>> address is at the first byte of a instruction. This is done by decoding
>> probed function from its head to the probe point.
>>
>> changes from v4:
>>  - change a comment according to Ananth's suggestion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> ...
>> +/* Recover original instruction */
> 
> /* Recover the probed instruction at addr for further analysis. */
> See below.

Sure.

> 
>> +static int recover_probed_instruction(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +	struct kprobe *kp;
>> +	kp = get_kprobe((void *)addr);
>> +	if (!kp)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* Don't use p->ainsn.insn; which will be modified by fix_riprel */
> 
> fix_riprel doesn't affect the instruction's length, which is what
> concerns this patch.  But we want this function to be useful for
> unforeseen uses as well, so I like the code you have.  Just consider the
> suggested comment changes.
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Don't use p->ainsn.insn, which could be modified -- e.g.,
> 	 * by fix_riprel().
> 	 */

Thanks, I'll update comments then!

> 
>> +	memcpy(buf, kp->addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>> +	buf[0] = kp->opcode;
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Jim Keniston
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/