lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:31:52 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v3

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:41:35 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:

> 
> Impact: make more big space below 4g for assigning to unassigned pci
> devices
> 
> don't need to reserved one round after the gapstart.
> 
> v2: Linus said: "
> 	We've definitely seen ACPI code or integrated graphics stuff 
> 	that steals a lot of memory at the end, which means that
> end-of-RAM might be not at 2GB, but at 2GB-16MB-1MB, for example (1MB
> of "ACPI data", and 16MB of "stolen video ram").
> 
> 	At a minimum, if we do this, I'd like to make sure we round
> up to a big boundary (eg 32MB or something - exactly because a
> missing 16MB can easily be some integrated stolen video memory).
> 
> 	Sure, we do that whole
> 
> 		while ((gapsize >> 4) > round)
> 			round += round;
> 
> 	thing, so that if the gap is large, then we'll certainly get
> to 32MB too, but I think your patch matters the most exactly when the
> gap is small. Maybe we could just raise the initial minimum rounding
> from 1MB to 32MB? ...
> 	Alternatively, maybe we can make sure that we round up to at
> least X bytes from the end of RAM, and to at least Y bytes from the
> end of some RESERVED thing."
> v3: take pci_mem_start - low_top_ram bigger than half around, aka 16M
> at least

Any comments on this one, Linus?  Should I include your ack?

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ