lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 May 2009 16:14:23 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	pavel@....cz, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM/Hibernate: Use memory allocations to free memory

On Sat, 2 May 2009 00:29:38 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> 
> Modify the hibernation memory shrinking code so that it will make
> memory allocations to free memory instead of using an artificial
> memory shrinking mechanism for that.  Remove the shrinking of
> memory from the suspend-to-RAM code, where it is not really
> necessary.  Finally, remove the no longer used memory shrinking
> functions from mm/vmscan.c .
> 
> ...
>
> +static long alloc_and_mark_pages(struct memory_bitmap *bm, long nr_pages)
>  {
> -	if (tmp > SHRINK_BITE)
> -		tmp = SHRINK_BITE;
> -	return shrink_all_memory(tmp);
> +	long nr_normal = 0;
> +
> +	while (nr_pages-- > 0) {
> +		struct page *page;
> +
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
> +		if (!page)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		memory_bm_set_bit(bm, page_to_pfn(page));
> +		if (!PageHighMem(page))
> +			nr_normal++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return nr_normal;
>  }

Do we need the bitmap?  I expect we can just string all these pages
onto a local list via page.lru.  Would need to check that - the
pageframe fields are quite overloaded.


> ...
>
> +#define SHRINK_BITE	10000
> +		long size, highmem_size, ret;
> +
> +		highmem_size = count_highmem_pages() - 2 * alloc_highmem;
> +		size = count_data_pages() + PAGES_FOR_IO + SPARE_PAGES
> +			- 2 * alloc_normal;

It'd be nice if this head-spinning arithmetic were spelled out in a
comment somewhere.  There are rather a lot of magic-number heuristics
in here.

>  		tmp = size;
>  		size += highmem_size;
>  		for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> @@ -621,27 +671,39 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)

All looks pretty sane to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ