linux-kernel - Re: "N" symbols and System.map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 May 2009 01:21:49 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "N" symbols and System.map

On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> 
> > right now, we filter out symbols that nm tag N, meaning "debugging
> > symbols", from System.map.  However, at least on x86, the linker-generated
> > symbol _end is tagged N, and in fact is the only N in the entire image.
> >
> > Are there other architectures which would suffer if N were included in
> > System.map, or would that be a reasonable thing to do?
> 
> There should not be any N symbols unless you are using stabs debugging.

We have in vmlinux:
        .end : AT(ADDR(.end) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
                _end = .;
        }


And I see:
c1834000 N _end

This is the _only_ 'N' symbol in my vmlinux.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/