linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 9/9] x86/apic: support moorestown interrupt subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:48:57 -0700
From:	"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/9] x86/apic: support moorestown interrupt subsystem

>
>This code is stylistically and structurally challenged and will need
>a lot more work to be acceptable. Please clean it up and abstract
>out the timer driver bits:
>
>The proper solution here is to first introduce a proper abstraction
>without adding the ABP bits - then can come a separate ABP patch
>that adds the new hardware support - without touching any other code
>but adding its own small driver module.
>
>	Ingo
[[JPAN]] thanks for the detailed comments, I will fix the style problem in the
 next version. I can separate APB timer code into another patch. But I need
a little more clarification for the abstraction you want. The reason why I did
it this way was it is similar to the other arch_setup_xx, e.g. HPET. In
 io_apic.c 
So do you want to abstract all the arch_setup_xxx in the new abstraction layer?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/