| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:56 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] smp_call_function_many SMP race
I noticed a failure where we hit the following WARN_ON in
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt:
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
continue;
data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
refs = atomic_dec_return(&data->refs);
WARN_ON(refs < 0); <-------------------------
We atomically tested and cleared our bit in the cpumask, and yet the number
of cpus left (ie refs) was 0. How can this be?
It turns out commit c0f68c2fab4898bcc4671a8fb941f428856b4ad5 (generic-ipi:
cleanup for generic_smp_call_function_interrupt()) is at fault. It removes
locking from smp_call_function_many and in doing so creates a rather
complicated race.
The problem comes about because:
- The smp_call_function_many interrupt handler walks call_function.queue
without any locking.
- We reuse a percpu data structure in smp_call_function_many.
- We do not wait for any RCU grace period before starting the next
smp_call_function_many.
Imagine a scenario where CPU A does two smp_call_functions back to back, and
CPU B does an smp_call_function in between. We concentrate on how CPU C handles
the calls:
CPU A CPU B CPU C
smp_call_function
smp_call_function_interrupt
walks call_function.queue
sees CPU A on list
smp_call_function
smp_call_function_interrupt
walks call_function.queue
sees (stale) CPU A on list
smp_call_function
reuses percpu *data
set data->cpumask
sees and clears bit in cpumask!
sees data->refs is 0!
set data->refs (too late!)
The important thing to note is since the interrupt handler walks a potentially
stale call_function.queue without any locking, then another cpu can view the
percpu *data structure at any time, even when the owner is in the process
of initialising it.
The following test case hits the WARN_ON 100% of the time on my PowerPC box
(having 128 threads does help :)
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#define ITERATIONS 100
static void do_nothing_ipi(void *dummy)
{
}
static void do_ipis(struct work_struct *dummy)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++)
smp_call_function(do_nothing_ipi, NULL, 1);
printk(KERN_DEBUG "cpu %d finished\n", smp_processor_id());
}
static struct work_struct work[NR_CPUS];
static int __init testcase_init(void)
{
int cpu;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
INIT_WORK(&work[cpu], do_ipis);
schedule_work_on(cpu, &work[cpu]);
}
return 0;
}
static void __exit testcase_exit(void)
{
}
module_init(testcase_init)
module_exit(testcase_exit)
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Anton Blanchard");
I tried to fix it by ordering the read and the write of ->cpumask and ->refs.
In doing so I missed a critical case but Paul McKenney was able to spot
my bug thankfully :) To ensure we arent viewing previous iterations the
interrupt handler needs to read ->refs then ->cpumask then ->refs _again_.
Thanks to Milton Miller and Paul McKenney for helping to debug this issue.
---
My head hurts. This needs some serious analysis before we can be sure it
fixes all the races. With all these memory barriers, maybe the previous
spinlocks weren't so bad after all :)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/smp.c 2010-03-23 05:09:08.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c 2010-03-23 06:12:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -193,6 +193,31 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &call_function.queue, csd.list) {
int refs;
+ /*
+ * Since we walk the list without any locks, we might
+ * see an entry that was completed, removed from the
+ * list and is in the process of being reused.
+ *
+ * Just checking data->refs then data->cpumask is not good
+ * enough because we could see a non zero data->refs from a
+ * previous iteration. We need to check data->refs, then
+ * data->cpumask then data->refs again. Talk about
+ * complicated!
+ */
+
+ if (atomic_read(&data->refs) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
+ continue;
+
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ if (atomic_read(&data->refs) == 0)
+ continue;
+
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
continue;
@@ -446,6 +471,14 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
data->csd.info = info;
cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, data->cpumask);
+
+ /*
+ * To ensure the interrupt handler gets an up to date view
+ * we order the cpumask and refs writes and order the
+ * read of them in the interrupt handler.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+
atomic_set(&data->refs, cpumask_weight(data->cpumask));
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists