linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] smp_call_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:26:43 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp_call_function_many SMP race

On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 22:15 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> 
> It turns out commit c0f68c2fab4898bcc4671a8fb941f428856b4ad5 (generic-ipi:
> cleanup for generic_smp_call_function_interrupt()) is at fault. It removes
> locking from smp_call_function_many and in doing so creates a rather
> complicated race. 

A rather simple question since my brain isn't quite ready processing the
content here..

Isn't reverting that one patch a simpler solution than adding all that
extra logic? If not, then the above statement seems false and we had a
bug even with that preempt_enable/disable() pair.

Just wondering.. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/