linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and export to userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Cc:	dilinger@...ued.net, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h and
 export to userspace

From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:36:50 -0600

> Weird.  Yeah, no other platforms expect to get a phandle type
> definition from the kernel headers.  The only thing driving this
> conversation is from arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild:
> 
> header-y += openprom.h

It was probably at one point for the sake of asm/openpromio.h but
that header has no dependencies on openprom.h

The only hit I can find in google code search, for non-kernel code, is
the SILO bootloader.

But that tree includes it's own copy of include/asm/openprom.h so
the actual kernel copy isn't even used.

I'd say we can stop exporting that header and also therefore not
worry about making phandle_t visible to userspace.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/