linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:11:59 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
	matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7

On 02/03/2011 02:02 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 01:05:44 pm H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Can we completely kill the "don't reload segments" flag, then?
> 
> We can as far as *I* am concerned, but of course it's a separate issue...

I'm trying to figure out if there is any actual user of it.  I thought
it was Xen which needed it, but Jeremy says it doesn't; I don't know
what else would possible need it.  If it is is something that isn't used
then it would be better to get rid of it.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/