linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:47:58 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
CC:	matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7

On 02/02/2011 12:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:10:03PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 01/31/2011 03:52 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> This worked, thanks! If this tests cleanly for you in qemu, we should get
>>> this committed.
>>>
>>
>> This is wrong for at least one reason; possibly two:
>>
>> a) it ignores the control to not reload the segment registers (not
>> sure if anything still uses them, but...)
>>
>> b) I'm not sure that init_thread_union is safe for the non-BSP CPU here.
> 
> What's the best way to move forward? Or, how can we find answers to these
> questions?
> 
> -Kees
> 


Can someone test out the attached patch and verify that it works?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


View attachment "diff" of type "text/plain" (1005 bytes)