[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:02:03 -0800
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x32-abi@...glegroups.com, Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, GCC Development <gcc@....gnu.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: X32 psABI status
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 01:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Why is the ia32 compatiblity kernel interface used?
>
> Because there is no way in hell we're designing in a second
> compatibility ABI in the kernel (and it has to be a compatibility ABI,
> because of the pointer size difference.)
I think he is asking why not create a new ABI layer for the kernel
like it is done for n32 for MIPS.
-- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists