[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:03:55 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"Munegowda, Keshava" <keshava_mgowda@...com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...com, b-cousson@...com, gadiyar@...com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, parthab@...ia.ti.com, tony@...mide.com,
johnstul@...ibm.com, vishwanath.bs@...com, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v13] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod structures
for omap4
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:19:43AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > > > do we have sibling structures today? I dont think so.
> > >
> > > no we don't.
> >
> > Ok, here's a first shot at it:
>
> In fact we do already have sibling lists. They are maintained as part
> of the device_private structure. What we are missing is a
> device_for_each_sibling() routine. It could be added pretty easily; it
> would be similar to device_for_each_child().
care to point out where is ?
68 struct device_private {
69 struct klist klist_children;
70 struct klist_node knode_parent;
71 struct klist_node knode_driver;
72 struct klist_node knode_bus;
73 void *driver_data;
74 struct device *device;
75 };
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists