linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:55:40 -0500
From:	Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@...il.com>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of long
> running projects and cleanup queues.  I've got btrfs patches in the new
> kernel.org btrfs repo.  There are two different branches with the same
> changes.  for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested against
> Linus' tree as of yesterday.

[91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2
[91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed

FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that
whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again.  Format change in 3.2 or
32/64 bit compatibility issues?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/