| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0500 From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> To: Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@...il.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Dan Merillat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of long > > running projects and cleanup queues. I've got btrfs patches in the new > > kernel.org btrfs repo. There are two different branches with the same > > changes. for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested against > > Linus' tree as of yesterday. > > [91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2 > [91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed > > FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that > whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again. Format change in 3.2 or > 32/64 bit compatibility issues? I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 and 3.1 code before releasing. I didn't try jumping between 32 and 64 bit. Are there any other messages in dmesg? Could you please see what btrfs-debug-tree says? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists