[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:45:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] kvm tool: Serial emulation overhaul
* Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:12 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > 50k cycles for every single byte is pretty much as good as it
> > > will get with serial console. See slide #5 in Marcelo's KVM
> > > Forum 2010 presentation[1] where he timed a heavyweight exit
> > > to about 40k cycles.
> >
> > > [1]
> > > http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/e/ea/2010-forum-mtosatti_walkthrough_entry_exit.pdf
> >
> > But what we do here is a PIO exit. That, according to
> > Marcelo's measurements, is about 10K cycles, back to back.
> > [*]
> No, everything on slide 5 is part of a PIO exit. Starting from
> 'out' and up to until it's back to the guest. A total of over
> 40k cycles.
No, slide 5 is a cumulative total, with the '+' showing the
individual costs, adding up to 10400 cycles total.
Please read that slide again ;-)
10K is bad enough IMO, 40K cycles would be 'out of this world
crazy'.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists