linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:26:19 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

>> Any news on this patch ?

> Sorry, just dropped it in the shuffle.  I'll get it into 3.4, thanks.

Roland,

I noted that you typically use the for-next branch of the infiniband
tree for fixes during
the 1 < kernN-rc < (say) 6 time and for features during (kernN-rc > 6)
till kern(N+1)-rc1

This means that the window of time when features are actually accepted
into your tree is kind of very limited. Would it be possible to
maintain two branches: for-next and (say) rc-fixes, such that
practically patches are reviewed/accepted to for-next at almost all
times?

BTW I see that networking and scsi maintainers use two trees
(net/net-next) and (scsi-misc/scsi-rc-fixes), maybe it would be eaiser
for you go this way?

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/