linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:35:16 -0800
From:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
To:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: use kthread_create_on_node

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com> wrote:
> I noted that you typically use the for-next branch of the infiniband
> tree for fixes during
> the 1 < kernN-rc < (say) 6 time and for features during (kernN-rc > 6)
> till kern(N+1)-rc1
>
> This means that the window of time when features are actually accepted
> into your tree is kind of very limited. Would it be possible to
> maintain two branches: for-next and (say) rc-fixes, such that
> practically patches are reviewed/accepted to for-next at almost all
> times?
>
> BTW I see that networking and scsi maintainers use two trees
> (net/net-next) and (scsi-misc/scsi-rc-fixes), maybe it would be eaiser
> for you go this way?

It's not really an issue of not having a tree to put things into.  It's
more that the window when I actually review major things is not
as big as perhaps it should be.

So I generally try to get fixes in expeditiously because they're
easy to deal with, whereas I only dedicate time to merging bigger
things when I feel the pressure of the impending merge window.

I do usually have some small patches that are fine for the next window
but which I have only marked "to apply" in my mailbox, which it
might be a good idea to apply sooner so they get more -next tree
coverage.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/