[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:40:01 +0530
From: Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>
To: jean.pihet@...oldbits.com
CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: move the driver specific
macros in include/linux/power
Hi Jean,
On 3/19/2012 9:42 PM, jean.pihet@...oldbits.com wrote:
> From: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@...com>
>
> Move the driver specific macros from the smartreflex header file
> (arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.h) in a new header file
> include/linux/power/smartreflex.h.
>
> This change makes the SmartReflex implementation ready for the move
> to drivers/.
I wonder why someone would need a new directory under drivers/power
where the code is not about introducing new and generic AVS framework
but it is all about OMAP specific code. What if tomorrow new generic
AVS framework comes from different chip vendor? I am sure this kind
of technology would be common in newer embedded chips.
---Trilok Soni
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists