linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: wlags49_h2: mdd.h: fixes tons of coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:32:56 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Johan Meiring <johanmeiring@...il.com>
Cc:	pe1dnn@...at.org, jkosina@...e.cz, standby24x7@...il.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: wlags49_h2: mdd.h: fixes tons of coding
 style issues

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:09:14PM +0200, Johan Meiring wrote:
> Will do.  Just a quick question: Is it acceptable to submit small
> patches even if the main file still fails the checkpatch,pl script?
> i.e. is it OK to fix e.g. the first 20 instances of C99 // comment
> usage, even if 200 remain afterwards, and then fix them later?

Yes, that is fine.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/