[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:14:13 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, namhyung.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf hists: Exchange order of comparing items when
collapsing hists
Em Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:56:32PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:29:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Got inverted.
> > The order was arbitrary, and was arbitrarily reversed, are you guys sure this
> > is the only side effect?
> right,
> currently (without namhyung's changes) there's initial 'name' sorting
> broken by hists_link
> after the change, it gets sorted 'but' there are dummy entries added
> which brake the sort again.. this is sorted out within the multi diff
> patches
> so the bottom line is that currently the sorting is broken anyway,
> and the fix is comming in upcomming patchset ;)
Ok, applied to my perf/core branch and pushed out.
> > Jiri, IIRC you mentioned that there would be some patch with an --order switch,
> > would that allow sorting by the entry that had the biggest change, etc?
>
> by default it'll sorted by baseline and you can specify -o X to sort
> by specified file
great.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists