lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:15:12 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add support for 64bit get_user() on x86-32

Can we worry about this after the merge window?

ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com wrote:

>From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
>
>Implement __get_user_8() for x86-32. It will return the
>64bit result in edx:eax register pair, and ecx is used
>to pass in the address and return the error value.
>
>For consistency, change the register assignment for all
>other __get_user_x() variants, so that address is passed in
>ecx/rcx, the error value is returned in ecx/rcx, and eax/rax
>contains the actual value.
>
>This is a partial refresh of a patch [1] by Jamie Lokier from
>2004. Only the minimal changes to implement 64bit get_user()
>were picked from the original patch.
>
>[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/198823
>
>Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
>Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
>---
> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h  |   17 ++++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c |    1 +
>arch/x86/lib/getuser.S          |   82
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>index 7ccf8d1..3f4387e 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ extern int __get_user_bad(void);
> 
> #define __get_user_x(size, ret, x, ptr)		      \
> 	asm volatile("call __get_user_" #size	      \
>-		     : "=a" (ret), "=d" (x)	      \
>+		     : "=c" (ret), "=a" (x)	      \
> 		     : "0" (ptr))		      \
> 
> /* Careful: we have to cast the result to the type of the pointer
>@@ -151,8 +151,11 @@ extern int __get_user_bad(void);
>  * On error, the variable @x is set to zero.
>  */
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>-#define __get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr)				\
>-		__get_user_x(X, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr)
>+#define __get_user_8(ret, x, ptr)		      \
>+	asm volatile("call __get_user_8"	      \
>+		     : "=c" (ret), "=A" (x)	      \
>+		     : "0" (ptr))		      \
>+
> #else
> #define __get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr)				\
> 		__get_user_x(8, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr)
>@@ -162,6 +165,7 @@ extern int __get_user_bad(void);
> ({									\
> 	int __ret_gu;							\
> 	unsigned long __val_gu;						\
>+	unsigned long long __val_gu8;					\
> 	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);						\
> 	might_fault();							\
> 	switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {					\
>@@ -175,13 +179,16 @@ extern int __get_user_bad(void);
> 		__get_user_x(4, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr);		\
> 		break;							\
> 	case 8:								\
>-		__get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr);			\
>+		__get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu8, ptr);			\
> 		break;							\
> 	default:							\
> 		__get_user_x(X, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr);		\
> 		break;							\
> 	}								\
>-	(x) = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__val_gu;				\
>+	if (sizeof(*(ptr)) == 8)					\
>+		(x) = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__val_gu8;			\
>+	else								\
>+		(x) = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__val_gu;			\
> 	__ret_gu;							\
> })
> 
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
>b/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
>index 9c3bd4a..0fa6912 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
>@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_generic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_user_1);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_user_2);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_user_4);
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_user_8);
> 
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__put_user_1);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__put_user_2);
>diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S b/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S
>index 156b9c8..38afef0 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S
>+++ b/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S
>@@ -14,12 +14,11 @@
> /*
>  * __get_user_X
>  *
>- * Inputs:	%[r|e]ax contains the address.
>- *		The register is modified, but all changes are undone
>- *		before returning because the C code doesn't know about it.
>+ * Inputs:	%[r|e]cx contains the address.
>  *
>- * Outputs:	%[r|e]ax is error code (0 or -EFAULT)
>- *		%[r|e]dx contains zero-extended value
>+ * Outputs:	%[r|e]cx is error code (0 or -EFAULT)
>+ *		%[r|e]ax contains zero-extended value
>+ *		%edx contains the high bits of the value for __get_user_8 on
>x86-32
>  *
>  *
>  * These functions should not modify any other registers,
>@@ -38,12 +37,12 @@
> 	.text
> ENTRY(__get_user_1)
> 	CFI_STARTPROC
>-	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX)
>-	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX
>+	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_AX)
>+	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_AX),%_ASM_CX
> 	jae bad_get_user
> 	ASM_STAC
>-1:	movzb (%_ASM_AX),%edx
>-	xor %eax,%eax
>+1:	movzb (%_ASM_CX),%eax
>+	xor %ecx,%ecx
> 	ASM_CLAC
> 	ret
> 	CFI_ENDPROC
>@@ -51,14 +50,14 @@ ENDPROC(__get_user_1)
> 
> ENTRY(__get_user_2)
> 	CFI_STARTPROC
>-	add $1,%_ASM_AX
>+	add $1,%_ASM_CX
> 	jc bad_get_user
>-	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX)
>-	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX
>+	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_AX)
>+	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_AX),%_ASM_CX
> 	jae bad_get_user
> 	ASM_STAC
>-2:	movzwl -1(%_ASM_AX),%edx
>-	xor %eax,%eax
>+2:	movzwl -1(%_ASM_CX),%eax
>+	xor %ecx,%ecx
> 	ASM_CLAC
> 	ret
> 	CFI_ENDPROC
>@@ -66,14 +65,14 @@ ENDPROC(__get_user_2)
> 
> ENTRY(__get_user_4)
> 	CFI_STARTPROC
>-	add $3,%_ASM_AX
>+	add $3,%_ASM_CX
> 	jc bad_get_user
>-	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX)
>-	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX
>+	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_AX)
>+	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_AX),%_ASM_CX
> 	jae bad_get_user
> 	ASM_STAC
>-3:	mov -3(%_ASM_AX),%edx
>-	xor %eax,%eax
>+3:	mov -3(%_ASM_CX),%eax
>+	xor %ecx,%ecx
> 	ASM_CLAC
> 	ret
> 	CFI_ENDPROC
>@@ -82,14 +81,30 @@ ENDPROC(__get_user_4)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> ENTRY(__get_user_8)
> 	CFI_STARTPROC
>-	add $7,%_ASM_AX
>+	add $7,%_ASM_CX
> 	jc bad_get_user
>-	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX)
>-	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX
>+	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_AX)
>+	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_AX),%_ASM_CX
> 	jae	bad_get_user
> 	ASM_STAC
>-4:	movq -7(%_ASM_AX),%_ASM_DX
>-	xor %eax,%eax
>+4:	movq -7(%_ASM_CX),%_ASM_AX
>+	xor %ecx,%ecx
>+	ASM_CLAC
>+	ret
>+	CFI_ENDPROC
>+ENDPROC(__get_user_8)
>+#else
>+ENTRY(__get_user_8)
>+	CFI_STARTPROC
>+	add $7,%_ASM_CX
>+	jc bad_get_user_8
>+	GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_AX)
>+	cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_AX),%_ASM_CX
>+	jae	bad_get_user_8
>+	ASM_STAC
>+4:	mov -7(%_ASM_CX),%eax
>+5:	mov -3(%_ASM_CX),%edx
>+	xor %ecx,%ecx
> 	ASM_CLAC
> 	ret
> 	CFI_ENDPROC
>@@ -98,16 +113,31 @@ ENDPROC(__get_user_8)
> 
> bad_get_user:
> 	CFI_STARTPROC
>-	xor %edx,%edx
>-	mov $(-EFAULT),%_ASM_AX
>+	xor %eax,%eax
>+	mov $(-EFAULT),%_ASM_CX
> 	ASM_CLAC
> 	ret
> 	CFI_ENDPROC
> END(bad_get_user)
> 
>+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>+bad_get_user_8:
>+	CFI_STARTPROC
>+	xor %eax,%eax
>+	xor %edx,%edx
>+	mov $(-EFAULT),%_ASM_CX
>+	ASM_CLAC
>+	ret
>+	CFI_ENDPROC
>+END(bad_get_user_8)
>+#endif
>+
> 	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b,bad_get_user)
> 	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b,bad_get_user)
> 	_ASM_EXTABLE(3b,bad_get_user)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> 	_ASM_EXTABLE(4b,bad_get_user)
>+#else
>+	_ASM_EXTABLE(4b,bad_get_user_8)
>+	_ASM_EXTABLE(5b,bad_get_user_8)
> #endif

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ