[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:26:44 +0400
From: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Vagin <avagin@...allels.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: fix validation of an address
>
> The kernel makes the decision on what is valid via security_mmap_addr().
> Assuming there are no security fears of an untrusted application
> tricking some priviledged application to set up these maps the answer is
> just calling security_mmap_addr() instead of doing if(addr <
> mmap_min_addr) return -EINVAL;
>
> I don't know if it is a good idea to allow this interface to ever go
> below mmap_min_addr, but I do know that using (or even thinking about)
> dac_mmap_min_addr is wrong and you should be looking at
> security_mmap_addr() if you look at anything...
This sounds reasonable. Thank you for the comments. I'm going to send
a second version of this patch.
>
> -Eric
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists