lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:55:27 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] <linux/of_platform.h>: fix compilation warnings with
 DT disabled

Hello.

On 01-03-2013 17:48, Rob Herring wrote:

>>>> Fix the following compilation warnings (in Simon Horman's renesas.git repo):

>>>> In file included from arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c:24:0:
>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct of_device_id’ declared
>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: its scope is only this definition
>>>> or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct device_node’ declared
>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]

>>>> <linux/of_platform.h> only #include's headers with definitions of the above
>>>> mentioned structures if CONFIG_OF_DEVICE=y but uses them even if not. One
>>>> solution is to move some #include's out of #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE and use
>>>> incomplete declarations for the rest of the structures where the #ifdef move
>>>> doesn't help...

>>>> Reported-by: Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>

>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>

>>> Grant, could you consider taking this patch?

>> Yes, I can, but I don't seem to have the original patch. Can you send it
>> again.

> Nevermind. Found it. I'll apply it.

    Will you drop 'struct device_node' declaration then or should I resend? In 
fact, I think I should better resend it with the changelog somewhat edited.

> Rob

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ