linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] <linux/of_platform.h>: fix compilation warnings with DT disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:02:46 -0600
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] <linux/of_platform.h>: fix compilation warnings with
 DT disabled

On 03/01/2013 07:55 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 01-03-2013 17:48, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
>>>>> Fix the following compilation warnings (in Simon Horman's
>>>>> renesas.git repo):
> 
>>>>> In file included from arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c:24:0:
>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct of_device_id’
>>>>> declared
>>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: its scope is only this
>>>>> definition
>>>>> or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by
>>>>> default]
>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct device_node’
>>>>> declared
>>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> 
>>>>> <linux/of_platform.h> only #include's headers with definitions of
>>>>> the above
>>>>> mentioned structures if CONFIG_OF_DEVICE=y but uses them even if
>>>>> not. One
>>>>> solution is to move some #include's out of #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE
>>>>> and use
>>>>> incomplete declarations for the rest of the structures where the
>>>>> #ifdef move
>>>>> doesn't help...
> 
>>>>> Reported-by: Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> 
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> 
>>>> Grant, could you consider taking this patch?
> 
>>> Yes, I can, but I don't seem to have the original patch. Can you send it
>>> again.
> 
>> Nevermind. Found it. I'll apply it.
> 
>    Will you drop 'struct device_node' declaration then or should I
> resend? In fact, I think I should better resend it with the changelog
> somewhat edited.

No, I plan to leave it as is and not rely on device.h by chance
declaring device_node.

Rob

> 
>> Rob
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/