linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT v2] x86/mce: Defer mce wakeups to threads for PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:42:43 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2] x86/mce: Defer mce wakeups to threads for
 PREEMPT_RT

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 15:31 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:33:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Comments?
> 
> I don't have a problem with it except with the yelling - I think I've
> gone deaf. And for Rostedt code it is pretty clean and even *I* can
> understand it :-).
> 
> Tony?
> 
> Steve, stupid question: since this is -rt only, why even push it
> upstream?
> 

I'm not (yet). But I just wanted to make sure there wasn't any little
subtleties that I might be missing.

When -rt goes mainline, code like this will be going mainline too, thus
the maintainers will see it then.

Thanks!

-- Steve
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/