linux-kernel - Re: sched: add notifier for cross-cpu migrations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:52:38 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	mtosatti@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, gleb@...hat.com,
	glommer@...allels.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy@...p.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched: add notifier for cross-cpu migrations

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:39:02PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just stumbled over commit 582b336ec2 and had a massive WTF moment.
> > 
> > The Changelog -- empty!
> > The Implementation -- complete crap!
> > 
> > fail^2.
> > 
> > A git grep later I find its x86_64 paravirt only.. for this we add 
> > unconditional crap to the scheduler?
> > 
> > At the _very_ least this should have been wrapped in a static_key and 
> > the changelog should have given some clue as to the what and why of this 
> > code.
> 
> My bad for letting it slip through...
> 
> Marcelo, mind implementing the suggestions from Peter?

So ideally we'd kill the entire notifier, notifiers make it far too easy for
others to use -- and I don't want silent users of stuff like this.

Ideally I'd see a direct callback:

  pvclock_migration_callback(t, new_cpu);

That compiles to 'do { } while (0);' for kernels without CONFIG_PARAVIRT.  Then
for paravirt it would use a static_key to get a real callback only if there's a
pvclock user.

Something like:

#define pvclock_migration_callback(_t, _cpu)			\
do {								\
	if (static_key_false(&pvclock_key))			\
		__pvclock_migration_callback((_t), (_cpu));	\
} while (0)

NOTE: static_key_false() doesn't test false, it assumes the default is false
and makes the function call the out-of-line jump -- horridly confusing function
name.

Your pvclock muck would do:

 static_key_slow_inc() -- for every new user and,
 static_key_slow_dec() -- for every user gone.

Its a reference count scheme, so that when there's no users there is only a 5
byte nop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/