| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:10:29 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoc: kirkwood: simplify probe error On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 13:39:54 +0100 > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > This doesn't apply to mainline as there's a clk_put() there. > > Right, it applies to linux-next: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:32:50 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote: > > > Always submit against where the code will be applied - -next in this > > case. Sorry, I'm just not going to bother with your patches unless you start posting them in such a way that interested parties can test them without having to run around and pull random trees. In other words, you should have Cc'd interested parties on that devm_* change patch - especially myself as I was the one who introduced that code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists