lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 3 Aug 2013 18:26:36 +0200
From:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ASoC: kirkwood: change kirkwood-i2s to
 mvebu-pcm-audio and DT doc

On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 14:48:55 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:18:58AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c b/sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c
> > index 9844010..4f817a2 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include "kirkwood.h"
> >  
> > -#define DRV_NAME	"kirkwood-i2s"
> > +#define DRV_NAME	"mvebu-pcm-audio"  
> 
> This breaks non-DT users of this driver.  The device in arch/arm/mach-kirkwood
> is left as "kirkwood-i2s" but the platform device is now called something
> different.

Oops, sorry, the patch to arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c went away
when I pulled the last kernel.

> >  static struct of_device_id kirkwood_i2s_of_match[] = {
> > -	{ .compatible = "marvell,kirkwood-i2s" },
> > +	{ .compatible = "marvell,mvebu-pcm-audio" },  
> 
> You've only just introduced "marvell,kirkwood-i2s" in the previous patch.
> Why introduce something and then immediately change its name?  This makes
> no sense what so ever.

2 patches for 2 different purposes. The first one just adds the DT
support. It is enough for DT based kernels. But some people wanted the
device name to be changed to 'mvebu'. So, the second patch.

-- 
Ken ar c'hentaƱ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ