[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:45:59 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: shuox.liu@...el.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: reset ftrace_read_cnt at ramoops_pstore_open
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:37 PM, <shuox.liu@...el.com> wrote:
> From: Liu ShuoX <shuox.liu@...el.com>
>
> ftrace_read_cnt need to be reset in open to support mutli times
> getting the records.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu ShuoX <shuox.liu@...el.com>
> ---
> fs/pstore/ram.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index fa8cef2..a5d0cab 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static int ramoops_pstore_open(struct pstore_info *psi)
>
> cxt->dump_read_cnt = 0;
> cxt->console_read_cnt = 0;
> + cxt->ftrace_read_cnt = 0;
> return 0;
> }
I think we need a separate function for "clear" for the
ramoops_context struct. IIUC, we're missing a similar initialization
in ramoops_probe, which lacks both console_read_cnt=0 and
ftrace_read_cnt=0. Then both places could call this?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists