[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:15:15 +0800
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support
On 2014/3/3 23:58, David E. Box wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's
>> the relationship between
>> arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c
>> and
>> drivers/platform/x86/intel_baytrail.c
>>
> iosf_mbi.c is the version that went upstream, no longer specific to baytrail.
Then should we remove the latter?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
>
> david box
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists