linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:01:48 -0800
From:	"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 06:15:15AM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/3/3 23:58, David E. Box wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's
> >> the relationship between
> >> 	arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c
> >> and
> >> 	drivers/platform/x86/intel_baytrail.c
> >>
> > iosf_mbi.c is the version that went upstream, no longer specific to baytrail.
> 
> Then should we remove the latter?
> 

Absolutely. I wasn't aware until now that this version went upstream. I didn't
see a tip for it. I'll send a patch to revert it.

david box
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/