linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf trace: Decode architecture-specific signal numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:14:26 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf trace: Decode architecture-specific signal
 numbers

Em Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 01:55:33PM +0000, Ben Hutchings escreveu:
> What's happening with this patch?  perf fails to build on alpha or sparc
> since 3.13.

Grrr, I thought I had processed all of these, but this got missed, did
it now, will push soon.

- Arnaldo
 
> Ben.
> 
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 01:00 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > SIGSTKFLT is not defined on alpha, mips or sparc.
> > SIGEMT and SIGSWI are defined on some architectures and should be
> > decoded here if so.
> > 
> > Fixes: 8bad5b0abfdb ('perf trace: Beautify signal number arg in several syscalls')
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 10 +++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index 5c32dcf..25ea64c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -807,7 +807,6 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_signum(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscal
> >  	P_SIGNUM(PIPE);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(ALRM);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(TERM);
> > -	P_SIGNUM(STKFLT);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(CHLD);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(CONT);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(STOP);
> > @@ -823,6 +822,15 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_signum(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscal
> >  	P_SIGNUM(IO);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(PWR);
> >  	P_SIGNUM(SYS);
> > +#ifdef SIGEMT
> > +	P_SIGNUM(EMT);
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef SIGSTKFLT
> > +	P_SIGNUM(STKFLT);
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef SIGSWI
> > +	P_SIGNUM(SWI);
> > +#endif
> >  	default: break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Hutchings
> I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/