linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove synchronize rcu/sched calls from _cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:44:59 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Kaushal Kumar <kaushalk@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Arun Bharadwaj <abharadw@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove synchronize rcu/sched calls from _cpu_down

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:26:08PM +0530, Kaushal Kumar wrote:
> synchronize_rcu calls fail hot-unplug latency tests since
> wait_rcu_gp can have very high latency, at times up to few
> hundred of millisecs.

So bloody what?

> These calls were earlier removed for the same reason by the
> commit 9ee349ad6d326df3633d43f54202427295999c47, but got added
> back as part of commit c4575f83b9fe87bb57b737bc8a667f746a20320a.

fatal: bad object c4575f83b9fe87bb57b737bc8a667f746a20320

> Moreover there should be no need for sync_sched() in _cpu_down
> as stop_machine() provides that barrier implicitly.

We should not rely on that, but also you've removed synchronize_rcu()
and this is not at all provided by stop_machine().

So NAK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/