linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] ACPI: Add GPIO-signaled event simulator.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:28:09 +0200
From:	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI: Add GPIO-signaled event simulator.

On 12.08.2014 12:01, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 02:36:02PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Tomasz Nowicki
>> <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> GPIO signaled events is quite new thing in Linux kernel.
>>> AFAIK, there are not many board which can take advantage of it.
>>> However, GPIO events are very useful feature during work on ACPI
>>> subsystems.
>>
>> Overall this seems like a pretty nice debug feature.
>>
>>> This commit emulates GPIO h/w behaviour and consists on read/write
>>> operation to debugfs file. GPIO device instance is still required in DSDT
>>> table along with _AEI resources and event methods.
>>>
>>> Reading from file provides pin to GPIO device map e.g. :
>>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/gpio_event
>>> GPIO device name: /__SB.GPI0
>>> Available GPIO pin map:
>>> /__SB.GPI0 <-> pin 0x100
>>>
>>> Based on that, user can trigger method corresponding to device pin number:
>>> $ echo "/__SB.GPI0 0x100" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/gpio_event
>>
>> I need input from Rafael and Mika as to whether this is a
>> good interface.
>
> Maybe it would make sense to move this into drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> and hide it behind some Kconfig entry?
>
> Since you already need to have DSDT/SSDT table for this to provide the
> GPIO device, _AEI and the event methods, I would rather make it so that
> acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt() will add debugfs entry for each GPIO
> it finds in _AEI, like:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/events/<GPIO DEVICE>/n
>
> And you could trigger it by writing '1' or something like that to that
> file.
>

Thanks for comments. The idea of available gpio events list under 
/sys/kernel/debug/acpi/events/<GPIO DEVICE>/n is worth adding.

However, acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt() would be called if we would 
have real GPIO H/W and related driver. Initial idea of this patch was to 
avoid that restriction. So there are two cases:
1. If we have GPIO chip, it is already described in DSDT/SSDT and using 
this patch, user could trigger events by software too.
2. None of GPIO chip, so we need to add GPIO/_AEI etc. descrition to 
DSDT/SSDT and pretend we have GPIO chip on board.

Regards,
Tomasz Nowicki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/