lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:19:45 -0700
From:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>
Cc:	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
	"dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com" <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	"b.zolnierkie@...sung.com" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] usb: dwc2: Revert patches causing problems

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:11:20PM +0000, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Robert Baldyga [mailto:r.baldyga@...sung.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:53 AM
> > 
> > These two patches breaks dwc2 driver. The first one causes build break,
> > the second breaks gadget at Samsung platforms.
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Robert Baldyga
> > 
> > Robert Baldyga (2):
> >   Revert "usb: dwc2: Update Kconfig to support dual-role"
> >   Revert "usb: dwc2: move "samsung,s3c6400-hsotg" into common platform"
> > 
> >  drivers/usb/dwc2/Kconfig    | 63 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> >  drivers/usb/dwc2/Makefile   | 21 +++++++--------
> >  drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c   |  1 +
> >  drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c |  1 -
> >  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> Yep, I can confirm the build breakage. Greg, we should revert these two
> before you send your update for the next -rc, if it's not too late.
> 
> Dinh, before resending the series, please test that each individual
> patch does not break the build.

I tested and didn't see the build breakage on my end, but I don't
test-build arm stuff...

Anyway, this is in the usb-next branch, not usb-linus, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ