linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/2] usb: dwc2: Revert patches causing problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:38:29 +0000
From:	Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>
To:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
	"dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com" <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	"b.zolnierkie@...sung.com" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] usb: dwc2: Revert patches causing problems

> From: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:20 PM
> 
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:11:20PM +0000, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > From: Robert Baldyga [mailto:r.baldyga@...sung.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:53 AM
> > >
> > > These two patches breaks dwc2 driver. The first one causes build break,
> > > the second breaks gadget at Samsung platforms.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Robert Baldyga
> > >
> > > Robert Baldyga (2):
> > >   Revert "usb: dwc2: Update Kconfig to support dual-role"
> > >   Revert "usb: dwc2: move "samsung,s3c6400-hsotg" into common platform"
> > >
> > >  drivers/usb/dwc2/Kconfig    | 63 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > >  drivers/usb/dwc2/Makefile   | 21 +++++++--------
> > >  drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c   |  1 +
> > >  drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c |  1 -
> > >  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >
> > Yep, I can confirm the build breakage. Greg, we should revert these two
> > before you send your update for the next -rc, if it's not too late.
> >
> > Dinh, before resending the series, please test that each individual
> > patch does not break the build.
> 
> I tested and didn't see the build breakage on my end, but I don't
> test-build arm stuff...
> 
> Anyway, this is in the usb-next branch, not usb-linus, right?

Oops, yes, you're right. So not so urgent I guess. I think we should
still revert, though. The two patches break -next, and are pointless
without the rest of the series.

-- 
Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/