| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:51:06 +0200
From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@....com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/amd: Use delayed mmu release notifier
Hi Joerg,
Could you please review this patch ?
Thanks,
Oded
On 10/25/2014 10:16 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> Hi,
> Could anyone please review this patch ?
>
> Thanks,
> Oded
>
> On 18/10/14 00:43, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> This patch makes use of the new delayed mmu release notifier feature in
>> mm code. This is necessary because on the one hand amd_iommu_unbind_pasid
>> must be called explicitly during the tear-down of a process, but on the
>> other hand, it could be called from a function (e.g. in amdkfd)
>> which is a call-back function for the mmu notifier release.
>> In such a case, amd_iommu_unbind_pasid must not free the pasid_state
>> object, as it is a member in the list of mmu release notifiers (and
>> freeing it in the middle of iterating the list will break the list).
>>
>> Therefore, this patch delays the release of pasid_state to a later
>> call-back, which is called inside an srcu, and there we can freely
>> release the object.
>>
>> The flow of function calls when a process is teared-down looks like this:
>> (This flow assumes that amdkfd is the client of amd_iommu_v2)
>>
>> 1. mmu release notifiers for the destroyed process are started to get called.
>>
>> 2. amd_iommu_v2 notifier gets called, and it calls a call-back
>> function (inv_ctx_cb). amdkfd, which implements this call-back function,
>> performs tear-down of the relevant queues per device per process.
>>
>> 3. Later, amdkfd's mmu notifier callback (kfd_process_notifier_release()) gets
>> called and releases more things that are related to the process.
>> In that function, amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() is explicitly called.
>>
>> 4. (current code) amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() frees the mmu notifier
>> object itself, which mustn't be freed while iterating over the list
>> of mmu notifiers.
>>
>> 4. (new code in this patch) amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() sets a delayed notifier,
>> using the delayed mmu release notifier feature (new in 3.17),
>> which does the actual release later, after the iteration over the list of
>> mmu notifiers is over.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c
>> index 5f578e8..1e83bdd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c
>> @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ struct pasid_state {
>> spinlock_t lock; /* Protect pri_queues and
>> mmu_notifer_count */
>> wait_queue_head_t wq; /* To wait for count == 0 */
>> +
>> + struct rcu_head rcu; /* Use for delayed freeing of
>> + pasid_state structure */
>> };
>>
>> struct device_state {
>> @@ -297,7 +300,6 @@ static void put_pasid_state_wait(struct pasid_state *pasid_state)
>> schedule();
>>
>> finish_wait(&pasid_state->wq, &wait);
>> - free_pasid_state(pasid_state);
>> }
>>
>> static void unbind_pasid(struct pasid_state *pasid_state)
>> @@ -369,6 +371,8 @@ static void free_pasid_states(struct device_state *dev_state)
>> put_pasid_state_wait(pasid_state); /* Reference taken in
>> amd_iommu_bind_pasid */
>>
>> + free_pasid_state(pasid_state);
>> +
>> /* Drop reference taken in amd_iommu_bind_pasid */
>> put_device_state(dev_state);
>> }
>> @@ -711,6 +715,17 @@ out:
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_bind_pasid);
>>
>> +static void pasid_state_destroy_delayed(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>> +{
>> + struct pasid_state *pasid_state;
>> +
>> + pasid_state = container_of(rcu, struct pasid_state, rcu);
>> +
>> + mmdrop(pasid_state->mm);
>> +
>> + free_pasid_state(pasid_state);
>> +}
>> +
>> void amd_iommu_unbind_pasid(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid)
>> {
>> struct pasid_state *pasid_state;
>> @@ -743,13 +758,24 @@ void amd_iommu_unbind_pasid(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid)
>> clear_pasid_state(dev_state, pasid_state->pasid);
>>
>> /*
>> + * Because we drop mm_count inside pasid_state_destroy_delayed
>> + * and because the mmu_notifier_unregister function also drop
>> + * mm_count we need to take an extra count here.
>> + */
>> + atomic_inc(&pasid_state->mm->mm_count);
>> +
>> + /*
>> * Call mmu_notifier_unregister to drop our reference
>> * to pasid_state->mm
>> */
>> - mmu_notifier_unregister(&pasid_state->mn, pasid_state->mm);
>> + mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(&pasid_state->mn, pasid_state->mm);
>>
>> put_pasid_state_wait(pasid_state); /* Reference taken in
>> - amd_iommu_bind_pasid */
>> + amd_iommu_pasid_bind */
>> +
>> + mmu_notifier_call_srcu(&pasid_state->rcu,
>> + &pasid_state_destroy_delayed);
>> +
>> out:
>> /* Drop reference taken in this function */
>> put_device_state(dev_state);
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists