linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/amd: Use delayed mmu release notifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:33:54 +0100
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@....com>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/amd: Use delayed mmu release notifier

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:43:27AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> 3. Later, amdkfd's mmu notifier callback (kfd_process_notifier_release()) gets
>    called and releases more things that are related to the process.
>    In that function, amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() is explicitly called.

Can't you just register a delayed funtion in
kfd_process_notifier_release() and call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() from
there? I really hate to make that part of the IOMMUv2 driver API,
especially since it is going to be turned into a generic IOMMU-API
extension.

And especially since all these hacks could be avoided if the KFD driver
would just turn down everything on closing the file descriptor.

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/