linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/21] nd_pmem: add NFIT support to the pmem driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:37:09 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/21] nd_pmem: add NFIT support to the pmem driver

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:36:18PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> nd_pmem attaches to persistent memory regions and namespaces emitted by
>> the nd subsystem, and, same as the original pmem driver, presents the
>> system-physical-address range as a block device.
>
> I don't think there is any need to move the driver around.

At this point in the patch series I agree, but in later patches we
take advantage of nd bus services.  "[PATCH 15/21] nd: pmem label sets
and namespace instantiation" adds support for labeled pmem namespaces,
and in "[PATCH 19/21] nd: infrastructure for btt devices" we make pmem
capable of hosting btt instances.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/