linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/21] nd_acpi: initial core implementation and nfit skeleton

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:41:03 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/21] nd_acpi: initial core implementation and nfit
 skeleton

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 21:35 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/block/nd/Kconfig

> +	depends on (X86 || IA64 || ARM || ARM64 || SH || XTENSA)

I've only skimmed this series. I still noticed this patch contains the
only Kconfig typo I know by heart. Because I think you meant to say:
	depends on (X86 || IA64 || ARM || ARM64 || SUPERH || XTENSA)

Is that right?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/