linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: update configuration option of SCSI_UFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 12:14:26 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	ygardi@...eaurora.org
Cc:	james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com, kishon@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, santoshsy@...il.com,
	linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org, subhashj@...eaurora.org,
	gbroner@...eaurora.org, dovl@...eaurora.org,
	Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jbottomley@...n.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: update configuration option of
 SCSI_UFS_QCOM component

On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:09 +0000, ygardi@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks
> > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in the
> > mainline tree.
> >
> 
> we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver, but
> we will soon.

Perhaps you could make that patch part of v2 of this series. I see
little point in this series without that patch. Perhaps someone else
still cares about it, but I'm not looking at it anymore.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/