lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:21:54 +0000
From:	Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
	"vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] serial: 8250_dw: Add UPF_SKIP_TEST to flags depend on
 device tree

From: Peter Hurley [mailto:peter@...leysoftware.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:21 PM

>>On 07/22/2015 05:34 AM, Noam Camus wrote:
>> From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
>> 
>> Add support for OF option "no-loopback-test"

> Changes to devicetree need to at least get acks from DT maintainers.
I will add them in my v2
Should I take this patch apart from this set or should I add DT maintainers to whole set?

Noam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ