| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:46:57 +0200 From: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com> To: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, "Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>, "vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] serial: 8250_dw: Add UPF_SKIP_TEST to flags depend on device tree On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com> wrote: > From: Peter Hurley [mailto:peter@...leysoftware.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:21 PM > >>>On 07/22/2015 05:34 AM, Noam Camus wrote: >>> From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com> >>> >>> Add support for OF option "no-loopback-test" > >> Changes to devicetree need to at least get acks from DT maintainers. > I will add them in my v2 > Should I take this patch apart from this set or should I add DT maintainers to whole set? Add them at least to your cover letter and this one specifically. It's a small set, so it's fine to add them to all patches, so they can see the bigger picture. No need to take this patch out of the set (and context). Frans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists