[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:01:19 +0000
From: "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org" <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC: "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than
255 CPUs
From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier@....com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 6:28 PM
> In my view, this makes the change a lot more palatable, and it can fit in exactly two patches:
>
> 1) add the acpi_subtable_proc stuff with the compatibility helpers
> 2) change arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c to do whatever you want it
> to do
> It will be a lot easier to review and to verify.
Thanks, Marc.
Sounds you're right, I'll try to follow KISS rule better next time. Will send updated patches.
Cheers,
Lukasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists