[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:02:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: byungchul.park@....com
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: make update_cpu_load_active care more than one tick
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:35:24PM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote:
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
>
> i found do_timer accounts other than one tick, so i made
> update_cpu_load_active care that.
>
> is it intended because of its overhead?
I think the idea was that the NO_HZ bits would deal with the other
cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists