lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:44:23 +0100
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused

On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
>
>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
>>> wireless-drivers trees.
>>
>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take
>> that one too?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for
> Michael or Rafal :)
>
> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC
> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork.

It was already sent once and Acked by Michael:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/

The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the
linux-wireless patchwork.

-- 
Rafał

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ